Why oh why has the 3D been presented in this way? I've just finished viewing this and found the following....Underwater shots = great 3D.....Above water shots = shallow 3D with occasional good moments. Why shoot a film in 3D and then only have a small percentage of the film actually use it in a proper way? The underwater climax looked fantastic and was in proper 3D. If only the rest of the movie was the same. Unfortunately, only about 10% of the film is actually spent underwater and so the 3D element overall is a huge fail. This kind of selective 3D filming defies logic and perpetuates the on-going frustrations of modern day 3D movies. Buy at Amazon.co.uk
